Subject-Writer+Relationship

===The Relationship between the Subject and the Writer ===

          >
 * ** The relationship between the subject and the writer is based on his observations on how storytelling relates to true experiences of the war. **
 * ** The writer explains this relationship by analyzing the proper components that make up a true war story. **

          // "If at the end of a war story you feel uplifted, or if you feel that some small bit of rectitude has been salvaged from the larger waste, then you have been made the victim of a very old and terrible lie." // (Pg 1)   <span style="FONT-SIZE: 90%; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma, Geneva, sans-serif"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 90%; FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">-Writer believes that if the reader is uplifted or even somewhat happy at the end of the story, then it is clear that a small portion of the story had been modified with vague and immoral details, to stimulate the reader’s feelings.

//                     "                  <span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Georgia','serif'; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">                 When a guy dies, like Lemon, you look away and then look back for a moment and then look away again...... when you go to tell about it, there is always that surreal seemingness which makes the story seem untrue, but which in fact represents the hard and exact truth as it seemed" (Pg 3  ) //   - Here the author addresses the importance of visual imagery in a true war story. He states that a true war story should contain more realistic and lively details, as it forms the foundation for narrating a successful war story. Writer also implies that a war story could be more factual if it's narrated by a true war veteran, just like himself.


 * A Pathiranage**